王新亮;王健;贾晶晶;唐立平;

• 1:滨州学院学报编辑部

摘要(Abstract)：

土壤盐碱化已经成为全球性环境问题。了解果树对盐碱胁迫的响应机理,对开发和利用盐碱地具有重要意义。总结了盐碱胁迫对植物产生的危害,重点阐述了果树耐盐碱研究的现状,以期为提高果树耐盐碱能力、培育耐盐碱果树新品种、利用盐碱地发展果树业提供参考。

关键词(KeyWords)： 土壤;盐碱胁迫;耐盐碱性;果树;响应机制

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 滨州学院博士学位人员及具有硕士学位的高级职称人员科研启动费项目(2019Y36)

作者(Author): 王新亮;王健;贾晶晶;唐立平;

Email:

DOI:

参考文献(References)：

• [1]杨微，郭继业，刘翘，李勃，薛健，尚慧，王双龙.植物抗盐碱胁迫作用的比较分析[J].种子世界，2013,(9):23-24.
• [2]文佩.黄河三角洲盐渍化土壤氮转化过程及冬小麦幼苗氮利用研究[D].烟台：中国科学院大学（中国科学院烟台海岸带研究所），2018.
• [3] Lin J X,Yu D F,Shi Y J,Sheng H C,Li C,Wang Y G,Mu C S,Li X Y. Salt-alkali tolerance during germination and establishment of Leymus chinensis in the songnen grassland of China[J]. Ecological Engineering,2016,(95):763-769.
• [4]毛恋，芦建国，江海燕.植物响应盐碱胁迫的机制[J/OL].分子植物育种，（2019-10-25). http：//kns. cnki. net/kcms/detail/46. 1068. S. 20190529. 1321. 008. html.
• [5]王佺珍，刘倩，高娅妮，柳旭.植物对盐碱胁迫的响应机制研究进展[J].生态学报，2017,37(16):5565-5577.
• [6] Capula-rodríguez R,Valdez-aguilar L A,Cartmill D L,Cartmill A D,Alia-Tejacal I. Supplementary calcium and potassium improve the response of tomato(Solanum lycopersicum L.)to simultaneous alkalinity, salinity, and boron stress[J]. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis,2016,47(4):505-511.
• [7] Chen W C,Cui P J,Sun H Y,Guo W Q,Yang C W,Jin H,Fang B,Shi D C. Comparative effects of salt and alkali stresses on organic acid accumulation and ionic balance of seabuckthorn(Hippophae rhamnoides L.)[J].Industrial Crops&Products,2009,30(3):351-358.
• [8]郭瑞，李峰，周际，李昊儒，夏旭，刘琪.亚麻响应盐、碱胁迫的生理特征[J].植物生态学报，2016,40(1):69-79.
• [9] Singh N, Bhatla S C. Nitric oxide and iron modulate heme oxygenase activity as a long distance signaling response to salt stress in sunflower seedling cotyledons[J].Nitric Oxide,2016,(53):54-64.
• [10]张庆霞，魏海蓉，刘庆忠，宗晓娟，王甲威，崔海金，张学寅.果树种质资源耐盐性评价及耐盐突变研究现状[J].安徽农业科学，2012,40(35):17050-17053.
• [11]马凯，汪良驹，王业遴，姜卫兵，顾平.十八种果树盐害症状与耐盐性研究[J].果树科学，1997,(1):1-5.
• [12]查仁明.果树耐盐机理研究进展[J].重庆师专学报，1997,(2):38-40.
• [13]史燕山，骆建霞，张涛，王瑞，孟庆田，刘艳军，赵大顺.核果类果树砧木耐盐性差异的研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报：自然科学版，2004,(3):45-48.
• [14]霍少洁，黄妍，李珍，杨静慧，刘艳军，夏凯丽，苗博瑛.盐碱地8个北美海棠品种生长特性比较[J].天津农学院学报，2018,25(3):24-28.
• [15]马昕，庞志蕊，杨静慧，李珍，刘艳军，王兴，李冰. 8个北美海棠品种耐盐碱生理差异研究[J].天津农学院学报，2018,25(4):24-28.
• [16] Zhang K X,Wen T,Dong J,Ma F W,Bai T H,Wang K,Li C Y. Comprehensive evaluation of tolerance to alkali stress by 17 genotypes of apple rootstocks[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture,2016,15(7):1499-1509.
• [17]张志晓，曾丽蓉，赵嘉菱，郭冰鑫，王燕，骆建霞，郑鑫，田雪.五种苹果砧木的生长及生理特性对盐胁迫的响应[J].北方园艺，2017,(3):19-25.
• [18] Zhu Y F,Wu Y X,Hu Y,Jia X M,Zhao T,Cheng L, Wang, Y X. Tolerance of two apple rootstocks to short-term salt stress:focus on chlorophyll degradation,photosynthesis,hormone and leaf ultrastructures[J]. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum,2019,41(6):87.
• [19]樊秀彩，刘崇怀，潘兴，郭景，南李民.水培条件下葡萄砧木对氯化钠的耐性鉴定[J].果树学报，2004,(2):128-131.
• [20]袁军伟，李敏敏，贾楠，刘长江，韩斌，尹勇刚，孙艳，郭紫娟，赵胜建. 21份葡萄砧木品种资源耐盐性鉴定[J].西北农业学报，2019,28(4):602-606.
• [21]陈继峰，刘三军，孔庆山，张世英.葡萄砧木的抗逆性试验[J].中外葡萄与葡萄酒，2000,(2):16-17.
• [22]晋学娟.葡萄不同砧穗组合耐盐碱能力研究[D].泰安：山东农业大学，2012.
• [23]张瑞，贾旭梅，朱祖雷，张夏燚，赵通，郭爱霞，刘兵，高立杨，王延秀.‘烟富六号’苹果在不同砧木上响应盐碱胁迫的光合及生理特性[J].果树学报，2019,36(6):718-728.
• [24] Jia X M,Wang H,Svetla S,Zhu Y F,Hu Y,Cheng L, Zhao T, Wang Y X. Comparative physiological responses and adaptive strategies of apple Malus halliana to salt,alkali and saline-alkali stress[J]. Scientia Horticulturae,2019,245:154-162.
• [25]刘兵，贾旭梅，朱祖雷，张瑞，赵通，王延秀.盐碱胁迫对垂丝海棠光合作用及渗透调节物质的影响[J].西北植物学报，2019,39(9):1618-1626.
• [26]肖遥，张新忠，王忆，吴婷，韩振海.八棱海棠בM9’杂交后代抗病及耐逆性遗传分析与优系筛选[J].果树学报，2015,32(5):815-823,997.
• [27]岳丽娜.黑树莓再生体系的建立和农杆菌介导的耐盐基因转化[D].重庆：西南大学，2008.
• [28]秦玲，康文怀，齐艳玲，蔡爱军.盐胁迫对酿酒葡萄叶片细胞结构及光合特性的影响[J].中国农业科学，2012,45(20):4233-4241.
• [29]李学孚，倪智敏，吴月燕，李美芹，刘蓉，饶慧云.盐胁迫对‘鄞红’葡萄光合特性及叶片细胞结构的影响[J].生态学报，2015,35(13):4436-4444.
• [30]姜卫兵，高光林，戴美松，韩浩章，汪良驹.盐胁迫对不同砧穗组合梨幼树光合日变化的影响[J].园艺学报，2003,(6):653-657.
• [31]辛惠卿，霍俊伟.环境胁迫对果树光合作用的影响[J].东北农业大学学报，2008,(9):130-135.
• [32]高光林，姜卫兵，俞开锦，汪良驹.盐胁迫对果树光合生理的影响[J].果树学报，2003,20(6):493-497.
• [33]高光林，姜卫兵，汪良驹，韩浩章，戴美松.砧木对盐处理下‘丰水’梨幼树光合特性的影响[J].园艺学报，2003,30(3):258-262.
• [34]邢庆振，郁松林，牛雅萍，于坤，宋曼曼.盐胁迫对葡萄幼苗光合及叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究，2011,29(3):96-100.
• [35]杜中军，翟衡，潘志勇，解秀芹.盐胁迫下苹果砧木光合能力及光合色素的变化[J].果树学报，2001,18(4):200-203.
• [36]贾旭梅，朱燕芳，王海，吴玉霞，赵通，程丽，朱祖雷，王延秀.垂丝海棠应对盐碱复合胁迫的生理响应[J].生态学报，2019,39(17):6349-6361.
• [37]朱燕芳，王延秀，陈佰鸿，胡亚.四种苹果砧木幼苗对NaCl胁迫的生理响应、根系生长及耐盐性评价[J].甘肃农业大学学报，2017,52(2):48-53.
• [38]王志强.盐碱胁迫对不同种源酸枣生长发育特性的影响及评价[D].阿拉尔：塔里木大学，2017.
• [39]王志强，吴翠云，杨哲，杨凡，武彦昌.盐碱胁迫对酸枣幼苗生长及生理生化特性的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究，2018,36(2):153-160.
• [40] Wen T,Dong L J,Wang L,Ma F W,Zou,Y J,Li,C Y. Changes in root architecture and endogenous hormone levels in two Malus rootstocks under alkali stress[J]. Scientia Horticulturae,2018,(235):198-204.
• [41] Yu X,Shi P,Hui C,Miao L F,Liu C L,Zhang Q Y, Feng C N. Effects of salt stress on the leaf shape and scaling of Pyrus betulifolia Bunge[J]. Symmetry,2019,11(8):991.
• [42]孙红，孙田雨，许丽丽，杜远鹏，姚玉新.长期低盐处理对葡萄果实品质及转录组的影响[J].植物生理学报，2017,53(12):2197-2205.
• [43]雷成军，朱建兰，常永义. NaCl、Na2CO3胁迫对‘红地球’葡萄‘贝达’嫁接苗生长及生理指标的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报，2012,47(5):50-55.
• [44] Sotiropoulos T E. Effect of NaCl and CaCl2on growth and contents of minerals, chlorophyll, proline and sugars in the apple rootstock M4 cultured in vitro[J]. Biologia Plantarum,2007,51(1):177-180.
• [45]樊秀彩，张亚冰，刘崇怀，潘兴，郭景南，李民，王姣.NaCl胁迫对葡萄幼苗叶片有机渗透调节物质和膜脂过氧化的影响[J].果树学报，2007,(6):765-769.
• [46]杨洪兵.苹果属植物抗盐机理的研究[D].北京：中国农业大学，2004.
• [47] Yang H B,Dong C H,Xu X F,Wang Y,Han Z H.Effects of NaCl and iso-osmotic polyethylene glycol stress on Na+/H+antiport activity of three Malus species with different salt tolerance[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture,2014,13(6):1276-1283.
• [48] Liu X,Liang W,Li Y X,Li M J,Ma B Q,Liu C H,Ma F W,Li C Y. Transcriptome analysis reveals the effects of alkali stress on root system architecture and endogenous hormones in apple rootstocks[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture,2019,18(10):2264-2271.
• [49] Li Y H,Zhang Y Z,Feng F J,Liang D,Cheng L L,Ma F W,Shi S G. Overexpression of a Malus vacuolar Na+/H+antiporter gene(MdNHX1)in apple rootstock M.26 and its influence on salt tolerance[J]. Plant Cell,Tissue and Organ Culture,2010,102(3):337-345.
• [50] Sun M H,Ma Q J,Liu X,Zhu X P,Hu D G,Hao Y J. Molecular cloning and functional characterization of MdNHX1 reveals its involvement in salt tolerance in apple calli and Arabidopsis[J]. Scientia Horticulturae,2017,215:126-133.
• [51] An J P,Yao J F,Xu R R,You C X,Wang X F,Hao Y J. An apple NAC transcription factor enhances salt stress tolerance by modulating the ethylene response[J]. Physiologia Plantarum,2018,164(3):279-289.
• [52] Das P, Majumder A L. Transcriptome analysis of grapevine under salinity and identification of key genes responsible for salt tolerance[J]. Functional&Integrative Genomics,2018,19:61-73.
• [53] Guan L,Haider M S,Khan N,Nasim,M,Jiu S T,Fiaz M,Zhu X D,Zhang K K,Fang J G. Transcriptome sequence analysis elaborates a complex defensive mechanism of grapevine(Vitis vinifera L.)in response to salt stress[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences,2018,19(12):4019.
• [54] Upadhyay A,Gaonkar T,Upadhyay A K,Jogaiah S,Shinde M P,Kadoo N Y,Gupta V S. Global transcriptome analysis of grapevine(Vitis vinifera L.)leaves under salt stress reveals differential response at early and late stages of stress in table grape cv. Thompson Seedless[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry,2018,129:168-179.
• [55]朱燕芳.混合盐碱胁迫下苹果砧木的抗性生理和蛋白组学分析[D].兰州：甘肃农业大学，2018.
• [56] Jia X M,Zhu Y F,Hu Y,Zhang R,Cheng L,Zhu Z L,Zhao T,Zhang X Y,Wang Y X. Integrated physiologic,proteomic, and metabolomic analyses of Malus halliana adaptation to saline-alkali stress[J]. Horticulture Research,2019,6:91.
• [57]曹兵，王晶，姬全喜.不同施氮水平下盐胁迫对灵武长枣苗生长的影响[J].西北林学院学报，2012,27(2):34-38.
• [58] Yang X Y,Li H Y,Jiang L,Tang X Q,Liu X W,Zhang H X. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi on the growth characteristics,root morphology,and ion distribution of Pyrus betulaefolia bunge under saline-alkaline stress[J]. Forest Science,2020,66(1):97-104.
• [59] Li C,Sun X,Chang C,Jia D F,Wei Z W,Li C Y,Ma F W. Dopamine alleviates salt-induced stress in Malushupehe nsis[J]. Physiologia Plantarum,2015,153(4):584-602.
• [60] Li C,Wang P,Wei Z W,Liang D,Liu C H,Yin L H,Jia D F,Fu M Y,Ma F W. The mitigation effects of exogenous melatonin on salinity-induced stress in Malus hupehensis[J]. Journal of Pineal Research,2012,53(3):298-306.